Danske Bank A/S, headquartered in Copenhagen, is Denmark's largest bank - the US Department of Justice itself described it that way in its own filings.
Why this case is unusually strong evidence
This was not a settlement over inadequate controls. Danske Bank pleaded guilty to a criminal offence. The case centred on its Estonian branch and its high-risk "Non-Resident Portfolio," serving large numbers of customers from outside Estonia - including from Russia and other former Soviet states. US authorities found that Danske Bank had misled its US correspondent banks about who those customers were, what risks they posed, and how weak its own AML controls actually were.
The scale
Between 2008 and 2016, approximately US$160 billion was processed through US banks on behalf of customers in that single Estonian portfolio - a figure that dwarfs the scale of BCCI's own 1990 Tampa prosecution by a factor of more than ten thousand.
Still operating
Despite the scale of the conduct and an actual criminal guilty plea, Danske Bank continued operating. The response was corporate criminal accountability, substantial forfeiture and financial penalties, major AML and compliance rebuilding, and continuing regulatory supervision - not closure.
The comparison with BCCI
This is arguably the cleanest test of the "criminal culture" label applied to BCCI. Denmark's largest bank pleaded guilty to a criminal conspiracy tied to $160 billion in suspect flows through a single branch, and kept operating under strengthened controls. BCCI's own criminal case - roughly $14 million across a handful of transactions at one branch, with no senior management implicated - was treated as grounds for shutting the entire worldwide institution. The scale gap between the two cases is not a rounding error; it is the whole argument.
Also read:
